|










| |
|
Alternative Fuels |
|
|
What have we learned? |
|
|

What can we, the ordinary
people, learn from the diverse and sometimes contradictory data about
climate change we are bombarded with?
The global picture about carbon is slowly emerging. It is stored in sea,
earth, plants, and animals. Nature has kept the balance between carbon
capture and release. However, during the past few centuries, especially the
last one, man has unearthed and burned stored carbon in enormous quantities.
What nature stored underground, man has brought to the surface and used
for fuel, polluting the atmosphere with carbon dioxide and other harmful
gases. When you think of it—it’s a stupid thing to do!
The process has been accelerated and compounded by industrialization,
modernization, and population explosion. For too long humanity ignored and
denied the adverse consequences of this unwise practice. Alarming signs of
catastrophic natural disasters are becoming self-evident.
Many alternatives for fossil fuels have been suggested and tested. The use
of food sources for this purpose has quickly boomeranged on the world,
putting millions of poor people in jeopardy due to escalating food prices.
The increasing fuel demands from the east, accompanied by wide-spread crop
failures, have exacerbated the looming food crisis.

The only viable bio-fuels seem to be those derived from inexhaustible
sources such as garbage and excrement. Other under-utilized natural sources
of energy are wind, sun, and water. The endless rolling of the waves and the
rise and fall of the tides are virtually still untapped.
Seventy percent of the earth is covered by water—many places five kilometers
deep. Why has this abundant source of HYDROGEN received so little attention?
It is unmistakably the cleanest fuel available. By sending electricity (from
a clean source) through water it is turned into hydrogen and oxygen. No
harmful by-products. When the hydrogen is burned it unites with oxygen,
forming water. Again no harmful by-products.
So? Why not convert to hydrogen on big scale? The price of oil will drop
dramatically, our dependence on fossil fuels will diminish sharply, and air-pollution
will be reduced to acceptable levels.
At this point in the argument a strange yes-but game ignites.
 |
Yes, but hydrogen is dangerous.
(So is gasoline).
|
 |
Yes, but it is difficult to
store hydrogen. (Safe tanks have been developed).
|
 |
Yes, but there is already a shortage of water at many places.
(Hydrogen fuel produces as much water as it was made of. When all cars,
buses, trucks, ships, planes, and power-plants run on hydrogen it will not change
the amount of water on earth, ice and vapor included).
|
 |
Yes, but think of the
astronomical costs to convert all cars to run on hydrogen. (BMW already
proved that the same car can run on either gasoline or hydrogen).
|
 |
Yes, but
think of all the investments in the oil industry, and all the jobs that will
be lost. (This argument has never stopped development. It did not deter
humanity when they switched from horse-carts to automobiles, from candles to
electricity, or from typewriters to computers. And by the way, the oil
industry can profit from the hydrogen produced in their
refineries).
Yes, but ... damn you! I’m cornered!
|
|
|
|