
Hydrogen
can be used to produce either combustion for ordinary gasoline
engines or electricity for electric
vehicles. Both have many advantages and a few drawbacks.
Hydrogen Combustion Engine (HCE)
BMW, Ford, Mazda, and
Mitsubishi have proved that an ordinary (slightly
modified) engine can run on either gasoline or hydrogen. This option has the
huge advantage that existing vehicles
don't have to be dumped in favor of
electric ones. This will save people billions of dollars―there are more than
800 million vehicles on roads world-wide.
When using hydrogen as fuel, those who
love their SUV's, trucks, minivans, or sports cars can proceed as usual
without feeling guilty and without being exploited at the pump.
Manufacturers don't have to close
factories producing these popular
vehicles. All they have to do is to change the propulsion of these vehicles
from gasoline to hydrogen. The problem is not the vehicle but its
fuel. One major advantage of HCE is that it starts
easily in below zero temperatures, making it more viable in cold countries
where electric vehicles falter.
There are many car-lovers who will never
be happy with electric cars, because they will miss the satisfying purr of
the internal combustion engine. It sounds like a mere psychological
preference, but don't under-estimate human nature.
Don't forget the huge number of suppliers
(and their employees) who all contribute to the manufacturing of engines. If
the internal combustion engine will disappear overnight it will have a
devastating ripple effect throughout
the economy--hurting workers in
manufacturing and maintenance, as well as the millions of car owners.
Drawbacks of HCE are the
same as for HFC: storage, transport, and safety.
Hydrogen Fuel Cell (HFC)
This technology combines hydrogen and
oxygen via a catalyst to produce electricity to propel a car via an electric
motor. The only byproduct
in the fuel cell is water. That is also its weak spot in extremely cold
weather -- when not operated, the water may freeze up the unit. Yet, most automobile manufacturers
experiment with this option.
Batteries
A legitimate question is:
If the path from windmill to battery is three times more
efficient than from windmill to hydrogen (Bossel), why
not store the clean electricity (from wind, water, and sun) in rechargeable
batteries?
Answers:
1. The amount of clean electricity fluctuates according to
the availability of wind, water, and sun. Batteries can't absorb
all surplus clean electricity, and most battery-powered cars will be
recharged at night when sunlight is not available. On the other hand,
hydrogen provides a handy additional option for storing surplus clean energy.
2. The drawbacks of
battery-powered cars are:
However, the fuel-cell is a long term plan.
It can help to eliminate some of the weaknesses of batteries mentioned
above. Cars
with ordinary engines have to be gradually replaced by these fuel-cell
models. It may take well over thirty years to complete the process.
Climate change will not wait that long.
We have to act now to prevent the collapse of the environment and the world
economy. Hydrogen-propelled combustion engines provides immediate relief for
ecology and economy.
HCE and HFC have to be applied
simultaneously, the first giving immediate relief, the second providing
future options.
Like HCE, HFC also has to deal with problems regarding storage,
transport, and safety.
CONCLUSIONS
-
BMW, Ford, Mazda, and Mitsubishi experiment with
gasoline/hydrogen combustion engines. This option will work well for the
medium term when hydrogen infrastructure is still lacking, and while
millions of existing gasoline cars are still on the road. These engines are
more reliable in sub-zero temperatures than the battery/fuel-cell option.
-
Other car makers experiment with
battery/fuel-cell combinations or battery/engine hybrids. Because batteries
and fuel-cells do not work well in temperatures below minus 10 C, these options
are not for countries that experience low temperatures often. Then the
hybrid option is more realistic.
-
Public use and preference are the ultimate
tests for any device. It may be the best policy for vehicle manufacturers to
offer both options (combustion and electricity) to the public and let them
determine what works best in different situations.
**********